Imagine The World If . . .

They'd be trying to stop you shooting at them while they're shooting at you freely

Total Gem of a Meme.
Quite dry humor, because it's accurate.

Not all Democrat Party Registered Voters are Libweirdos,
Yet ALL Democrat candidates, selected err elected,
U.S. Congressmen and Senators are LIBWEIRDOS.

Funny enough, neither the Democratic nor Republican Party existed during the revolutionary war and the Bill of Rights (with the 5th amendment that gives people due process in court) was ratified 8 years after America's victory in 1783

So no, this meme is not really accurate lol

Rugged arithmetic.

How does one get
1783 + 8 = 1789 ?

Just curious. I hope someday you're not a math educator for anybody...
...unless you demonstrate marked improvement in your demonstrated skillset

Key word: Ratified

You criticize my arithmetic on a flawed statement which assumes that the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1789 lol

the amendments of the bill of rights were PROPOSED and DRAFTED by September 25th, 1789 which was finally RATIFIED on December 15th, 1791 where all states practiced the amendments, so roughly 8 years after America won the war of independence.

The Bill of Rights was a work in progress in 1789, yet by assumption, your claim suggests that it wasn't ratified in 1791 (I only said "the Bill of Rights was ratified 8 years after America's victory in 1783" and you call out my math of all things haha).

However, if you claim that my assumption is false, and that you already knew it was ratified in late 1791 (because 1783+8=1791 lol), I beseech you to enlighten me: what was the point you were trying to raise in the first place?

Not the best at math anyways, but at least my history makes up for it lol

"The Bill of Rights was a work in progress in 1789"
What changed in it between 1789 and 1791?
It came out of the Virginia Resolves, and mainly penned by Madison with contributions by Hamilton, and believe it or not, George Mason gave lmuch legal input.

Your assumption that it was a "work in progress" alludes to items within it being evolved from 1789-1791. If one reads the Virginia Resolves to see what actually were the motivations behind what was penned into ratification; one may see that what was down on paper in 1789 is no different, not a word, than what was eventually ratified by ALL 13 states.

Am I missing something here?

Oh, yes. Crickets on todays Democrat Party, which if one is fiscally conservative, one is not on board with the Woke, LIBWEIRDO, Marxist-Style-"Democracy", Globalist causes.
Semantics on the math of 1789-91 is moot when this is the beseeched point.

what have we been cooking up for 3 weeks bro 🥀🥀

disinterest

And would the majority of the Republican Party accept members of their own who don't lean as right as they do? Likely not, the "politics" channel here highlights how screwed this damn country is because we don't want to get along--calling people you disagree with as LIBWEIRDO Marxist terrorists makes you no better than those who call you fascist hitler loving rednecks, does it not? I too have said a similar thing in the past, and here I am not afraid to admit it

However...

I got to see the true world around me: two sides of people screaming at one another, clawing, tearing, and ruthlessly bantering one another to not fix, not to strengthen this nation, but to destroy it and violently waltz in the rubble that once fostered different ideas, perspectives, not to enforce, but encourage. You might see me and say I am a gay-loving Marxist Libtard, I see you as one of millions of Americans who aren't controlled by their free will, but by a seed of hate that had been passed down generations upon generations and the tree has grown so large, we find it impossible to cut it down.

Peace my brotha (we really need it now)

Is there such a person, or group of persons that are worthy of being labeled
LIBWEIRDO Marxist Terrorists ?

Could Susan Rosenberg, Linda Evans, or Angela Davis fit that description, amongst others ?

For one Example:

-Might it be considered Weird and rather Liberal to wish to abolish prisons for convicted criminals to have a humane place to live out their justice as convicted life sentences?
-Might it also be weird to buy GUNS for Terrorists to take hostages at a federal Courthouse ?
-Might it also be considered MARXIST, to run as the Communist Party of America Vice Presidential Candidate in the USA presidential elections of 1980 and 1984 on that ticket ?

If so, then the protege' of Herbert Marcuse could fit the Label, and is a tenured employee of the University System of the USA state of California.

If acknowledging these facts, and labeling such individuals that perform such tasks as these and others accomplish, as "Libweirdo Marxist Terrorists" when they self claim being Marxist;
then call me what you will.

Nobody has ever called me a "fascist hitler loving redneck", yet if you'd like to do so it would be inaccurate, and the only reason you'd do so is that I pointed out the facts regarding a few specific individuals of which there exist freely Mountains of others, that also fit the labels used accurately. You are free to use free speech, until it is defamatory and inaccurate.
Using Libweirdo Marxist Terrorist to describe weirdly liberal self proclaimed Marxists that have performed acts of terrorism, to support their radically extreme political ideologies can be demonstrated. However, you cannot support your labelling nor name calling with any examples.

I would not "see you", and say you are a "gay-loving Marxist Libtard". I could, if your actions demonstrate such, and earn such a label, yet I might refrain. That also is conjecture on your part to predict falsely and inaccurately about others you disagree with and label their differing perspective as hate.
Take a long look in the mirror, and you may find a War that you bring upon yourself w/the self.

Don't think you're getting the message I was going for but oh well

Bin laden. Bin Laden. They said bin Laden should have gotten a fair trial. That he didn't get due process. Bin Laden. Of all the people on earth, the nuke 'em all contingent felt sorry for bin Laden. Bin Laden.

Nah bro, Bin Laden was dead long before they claimed the dry killed him. We know this because he was on dialysis and there's a maximum lifespan on that. They pulled his body out of cold storage when they needed a news story.

What do you think the maximum lifespan on dialysis is?

Its much longer now but look at what it was back then. Very short.

did someone forget to send me the memo?

The constitution says nothing about due process for your enemies in a war.

Lol the constitution only applies in a court of law, and even then laws are set beyond constitutional rights regarding illegal or legal status. The constitution is this shield that only gets applied if a lawyer can prove a individuals rights were violated beyond the application of the law, and those rights would need clear definition and evidence of being violated. Simply someone who is already breaking a law, doesn't deserve constitutional protections.

The tenets of the U.S. Constitution exist with or without it, therefore it is a grand absurdity to assert
that these tenets "only applies in a court of law" because the Bill of Rights is merely indicative of their unalienable status. Lol or laugh in silence.

Some obscure president known as Abraham Lincoln. Shut down 300 newspapers for not showing him proper love, suspended habeas corpus, decided to end slavery simply only to cripple the South's economy and to keep them economically dependent on the North.... They got recasted as a White Messiah who freed the slaves

Fun fact the Scottish king captured prisoners of war and made them slaves banished to America to the participate as slave traders. A weird type of monarch double standard. Make a slave to become a slave trader. History is a big puzzle with lots of missing pieces.

Or as slaves, or more precisely, indentured servants.

Name this Scottish King you speak of as fact.
Consider providing a date too, if that's not too much to ask for verification purposes.

1650s.

Just Wikipedia Scottish colonialism of America.

War is hell

You're not far off the mark. One might add that
Honest Abe also honestly called up 75,000 troops to be trained for six weeks by McLellan to go on the offensive and attack his own citizens. First few tasks accomplished were breaking a printing press
or two in Virginia. That, and his political opponent mysteriously experienced a coincidental death on the same day.

McLellan at the time in the spring of 1861 was a Railroad Executive whom had within the previous decade surveyed one route for then USA Secretary of War, Jefferson Davis; in the aftermath of the Mexican American War. Davis had delegated the design of 5 Transcontinental Railroads. There would soon be War to decide the control over Labor needed to construct these, as well as the 3rd Industrial Revolution & Natural Resources needed to accomplish all 5; and political power to be setup in all the towns and cities served by such, that eventually sprouted up as a result of completion.

The WEF calls this period we're in the predecessor to the 4th industrial revolution.
If the political climate feels like Harpers Ferry in October of 1859; it might be because it has echoes.

Be aware that the U.S. Civil War is ONLY allowed to be discussed in terms of the ending of SLAVERY, as that is the only good that came out of 500,000+ deaths in War.
Well, some might make that case that the invention of Prosthetic Limbs is also a good.
So, maybe it is okay to discuss that as well.