i don't know, it just smacks of theater on how it is being talked about.
but from what i can tell, that was a professional at work, not some rando political psycho.
Kirk wasn't just some internet pundit, he had a legit political apparatus in place.
3500 centers across the country.
he practically handed trump the presidency.
Shapiro or levin WISHED that had the influence and clout kirk had.
so the deranged leftie who hated free speech but had the skills of a trained sniper just does not track with me.
who benefits from kirk dying?
the left? lol, no and the dems are doing their best to drown the left in the bathwater anyways,
the dems? how? killing kirk only makes his message MORE powerful, that's basically the obi wan Kenobi tactic. possible though, because the dems are just....awful.
because it makes kirk a martyr, and maybe that was the point. i don't know.
kirks political career was on a constant trajectory towards a possible presidency.
the infrastructure and followers were already in place.
he was a legit power broker at 31.
i have only watched a few of his podcasts, i am going to go back and see if he started talking about
no no topics.
and let's see who tries to squeeze the most they can out of Charlie's assassination.
because i think this was certainly a political assassination, i am just not sure it was some rando lefty.