Imgflip Logo Icon

Charlie Kirk was killed for his beliefs and to intimidate anyone who have those same beliefs

Charlie Kirk was killed for his beliefs and to intimidate anyone who have those same beliefs | Charlie stood for Faith, Family, and Country; Everything that crazed liberals hate | image tagged in charlie kirk,killed for his beliefs,faith,family,country | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
987 views 71 upvotes Made by AmericanViking 6 days ago in politics
82 Comments
16 ups, 6d,
3 replies
At this point, we can just declare liberals a terrorist organization
14 ups, 6d,
1 reply
pretty much... yeah
11 ups, 6d,
2 replies
Chuckle it up and laugh while you can.
Today was pretty much the end of the democratic party
8 ups, 6d,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Okay:
the left killed Lincoln, MLK, Kennedy, other Kennedy, shot DJT, burned half the country to the ground in 2020, founded the KKK, and the confederate states, was the part of slavery and Jim Crowe, and sundown towns, and segregation...
and the left shot and murdered Charlie Kirk for literally no reason whatsoever.

I could go on.
2 ups, 5d,
2 replies
That's a whole lotta wrong

Lincoln and MLK were shot by conservatives
JFK possibly, RFK unknown
trump was shot by a Republican
Nobody burned half the country to the ground
The KKK is a conservative group and always has been
Liberals opposed slavery, Jim Crow, sundown towns, and segregation

Pretty much everything you said was false and was easily debunked. You make a common conservative mistake of thinking that Democrats 150 years ago were liberal and they weren't.

Now go look up the actual data by the FBI on political violence by people on the left and political violence by people on the right
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
"Now go look up the actual data by the FBI on political violence by people on the left and political violence by people on the right"

Okay. I did. The left is shooting people they disagree with at shockingly high rates and they are out of control with their violence.
1 up, 5d,
1 reply
provide the link to the source that said that (you're lying so of course you won't)
[deleted]
1 up, 5d
It's actually just self evident. Leftists are fascists and violent extremists who will stop at nothing to destroy their enemies even if it means murdering them in front of their children.
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Doesn't matter, Democrats were not attached to any of those things. If they were, they would have been sued out of existence ages ago.

What he named all has to do with the South. While the Democratic Party might have been the majority party in the South, they weren't the only party, and they were also a major party in the North. Yet none of anything listed there has to do with the North. Except Trump getting shot in Pennsylvania, maybe, but we all know Pennsylvania is just a Southern/Confederate State that got misplaced on the map. Also the Fauxassination was a false flag anyways.
1 up, 5d
Exactly
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
the overwhelming stats point to black democrats who commit violent crimes , 13% of the population - 50+% of all homicides - In 2023, there were 12,276 Black homicide victims in the United States, and Black individuals represented a significant portion of homicide offenders, with -51.2%- of murder arrests attributed to them.
1 up, 5d
FBI crime statistics don't say anything about political affiliation so you're obvs lying. And I wasn't talking about every day crime. I was talking about incidents of political violence and domestic terrorism. People on the right do more of that than people on the left.
0 ups, 5d
[image deleted]
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
I share your sympathy over Kirk, a family man/father, and husband, ripped from the arms of his loved ones was in no way shape or form acceptable, he deserved the freedom to exercise his first amendment right to openly debate people.

But this is the point where things can spiral into chaos and disorder, and we are doomed to repeat history's merciless cycles. When specific groups of people are targeted by words of a person who has a huge following, they're going to typically build discontent with that person. It is not illegal for people to speak about what they believe in, that's a right every American has, but it almost gives more reason for people to grow a disliking of someone that has associated their group in negative connotations. It can happen to anyone.

It's especially a poor judgement to cast this assumption that all democrats support this behavior, many left-leaning leaders had expressed their condolences to the Kirks, but it is a shame that a cycle of hatred will continue to rotate. Nonetheless, from a left-leaning perspective, people targeted by the rhetoric of Kirk's words are devaluing the purpose of ending gun violence, especially political violence.

It hurts that people cannot find common ground to end this hatred both sides have for one another because it has caused people to react violently (Kirk's assassin, Malissa Hortman's assassin, etc). We cannot get things done by hating the other half of the country, after all, it really cancels out and no progress is being made, allowing for more gun violence taking the lives of people like Kirk. Please, my fellow left and right leaning Americans, the very thing that delays decisions that can save lives is our own animosity. We are to be united, not divisive. I understand some of you may disagree with what I propose, but other than finding common ground, what other decision benefits everyone in the country?

(NOTE: I believe Americans can exercise the 2nd Amendment, but limitations must be in order to prevent someone like a family man such as Charlie Kirk, being murdered by an individual that cannot express their opinions in a civil manner)

In Abraham Lincoln's own words: "A house divided against itself cannot stand"

(If you have read this from the top to here, I sincerely thank you for sparing your time to understand where I'm coming from)
1 up, 5d,
1 reply
There are no excuses for those who have their feeling hurt.... so they have to resort to violence...
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Yep, and civil debates and exercising the first amendment is much preferred, it's disgusting and utterly sad that political violence happens.

But it's not quite exactly that just their feelings are being hurt, the people on the other side almost had reason to hate back, yet said reason should not warrant death, it was merely the causality of hate fostering hate on the other side.

It would make sense, however, that people would take offense to what is said against them, but the groups that are (in this case) more associated with the Democratic Party have had history with the same things said about them today, but were much more severe and these groups had faced heavier oppression. The fears and judgements of what those groups had formed during those times will carry down because they fear the upcoming generations will carry the discontent that had been passed down by their oppressors.

I do not want to come off saying either side was good/bad or justified, that would prove myself as someone with poor judgement---I'm trying to provide insight and a possible answer as to why these people's "feelings" would be hurt in the first place.

But yes, under no circumstances should a person ever resort to violence. Political disagreements never exempts someone to commit a horrible crime that strips the life of a person. It ruins all families and their loved ones and will only add more hatred and from all sides and delay solutions that can prevent similar tragedies from happening.

Hatred will reveal itself more and more through more and bloodier tragedies of American people, both left and right.
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Yeah... a lot of people are leaving the democrats over this...
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
It's just a really confusing and weird time to be in :\

I just feel like Trump's not bridging the gap between democrats and republicans, and I wish people could see each other as human beings rather than the political entities they associate themselves with.

But I'm glad we can be honest about what we say as America is a free country
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Democrats may have ended themselves with this assassination. No sane person wants any part of the democrat party.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
Alright, so be it
If Americans keep polarizing another Americans, then I think everyone in this country should give up on this experiment that we call America that has been going on for more than 200 years because at this rate, we're as good as dead.

People/U.S citizens will always have a belief in why they align with democratic or republican parties---whether a person understands it or not, they have their reasons.
No side is insane.

We are a force of indomitable power when we UNITE, we will only collapse as a society if we cannot find common ground. When a side claims the other side is tearing the flesh of liberty from the body of this nation, they will grab it towards them until both sides are in a struggle, not realizing they both are slowly killing the very thing they are fighting for, only for their own benefit.

Republicans and Democrats are doing an equally awful job because we have forgotten that we are meant to be united people and focus on dividing into their own states. The thing WE ought to do is control the animosity towards one another and come to common ground/compromises. After all, compromises had critically helped giving life to this nation for it to come alive.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
A lot of this started when Trump declared his candidacy back in 2015... Ever since, it's been one big hate campaign by the liberal media. I blame them. Everyone talks about turning down the temperature... This will never get any better until they own it and those responsible for it are held accountable... Until then, they won't stop.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
Observing hatred on both sides is not a politically driven campaign, it is simply piecing perspectives and the
If you cannot try to see where they are coming from (yet of course you can still disagree with them) you're no better than the thing you hate.
Scapegoating an opportunity to unite caused by a group you despise only reveals further hatred and resentment Americans have towards one another. It goes for both sides, not all republicans want every person in the country to have a gun to shoot people, the only people who (on both sides) would do something similar are the outliers of a party, not the entirety itself.
0 ups, 4d
*forgot to delete "and the" in the first paragraph, mb
0 ups, 5d
isnt charlie the yellow feller from smiling friends
like
who is this guy
2 ups, 5d,
2 replies
Nope. He was against all that. He knew that freedom of choice is the only thing that leads to God. So while he felt a lot of things were sinful and dangerous and damagingto humanity, he did not want them outlawed.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
man take God out of this shit. they aren't even real
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
God was proven real by science with the requirement of an observer for the energy to act as particles (see particle/wave observer) in order for matter to form at the beginning of the universe. We really need to figure out who this God guy is and what he wants.
0 ups, 4d
How do you know this "God" (source btw?) even has a gender
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Freedom of choice is the only thing that leads to the Serpent God, or rather from him, as it was his gift to humanity. Submission leads to Yahweh, and that only from his Chosen people, the Jews. Gentiles don't count in his book.
1 up, 5d,
2 replies
Freedom of choice was given by God so that we can choose God and in doing so become more than a tool.
You really should read the Bible if you are going to talk about it with any authority. God invited all people to join him in the old testament all they had to do was follow the commands he gave Moses. Prophecy after prophecy in the old testament said he was going to make a way for all people to be saved.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
I have read the bible. Have you?
The difference between atheists and christians is that atheists have read the bible
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
No. I've read it cover to cover several times and deeply studied it, even going back to the original culture, how it compares to other documents of the time and even looking into its history and translation.
0 ups, 4d
sure bud
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Yes, it was, the Great Serpent God of Truth & Knowledge... the light - that's why people confuse Lucifer with him.

Correct again, Yahweh did invite all peoples to join him. All people were the Hebrews. According to the Good Book.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
Nope. Wrong again. "The light" was Lucifer. The great deceiver. You don't understand the Bible at all. Without free will you cannot submit. You are either automatically for or against. With free will you choose.
0 ups, 4d
Which is what I said. Did you not make it to the end of the sentence?
1 up, 5d,
1 reply
Actually, Charlie was killed for his beliefs.
1 up, 5d
Nope... fact
14 ups, 6d,
2 replies
Oh just stop talking for once, nobody comes to this site to hear what you've got to say
0 ups, 5d
Hence your comment to him?
13 ups, 6d,
1 reply
He spoke and wrote voluminously. So show me his racism. It should be super easy.
14 ups, 6d,
1 reply
I remember that episode. The remark was part of a broader critique of DEI policies, where he argued that such initiatives prioritize demographics over merit. Context matters.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
He cannot justify his hatred and rage at Charlie Kirk, so he has to lie or misquote him to do so. The Left are liars.
1 up, 5d,
1 reply
What I posted was an actual quote from him
[deleted]
1 up, 5d
No you didn't. you took one sentence out of an entire paragraph he said, chopped that sentence in half, and then posted it. That's not an actual quote.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
He didn't ask you to show quotations ABOUT race or DEI as here, he asked you to show him any quote in context that proved he believed in the superiority or inferiority of one race over another.
1 up, 5d
I did, thanks
13 ups, 6d,
2 replies
Slander
13 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Wow... you really have a warped viewpoint of what is racist...
14 ups, 6d
More slander... thanks
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d
Racist = everyone who proves a leftist wrong.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
2 replies
Party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, and the Confederacy says what?

That's what I thought.
2 ups, 5d,
1 reply
It's 2025 not 1865. Keep trying
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
I don't care what year it is. Your party was still responsible for it.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
2 replies
No. But a party did create the Confederacy and the KKK and Jim Crow laws.
2 ups, 5d
Correct
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
You mean the mountain of evidence that I brought before you that you rejected anyways? Probably not because I'm not going to cast my pearls before swine anymore.
1 up, 5d,
2 replies
No, you did not bring a mountain of evidence. In fact, you did not bring any evidence. And it's not just because there isn't any to bring, you just dodged it plain and simple, and openly.

But I'll play. Go ahead and post it. I'll wait.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d
Are you talking about that huge mountain of evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ I had on the one meme that you joined?
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Yes I did. You just didn't like that what I brought contradicted your current beliefs jeopardizing your worldview, so you dismissed it all with whataboutisms to allow you to remain in ignorance. It's actually a very, very old tactic.
1 up, 5d
What on Earth are you going on about?

TWO separate individuals, myself and the OP previously, had asked you for this so-called proof that you claimed, and you repeated a one sentence reply.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5d
Um...okay?
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • ffb8f55ce69fd70923a1e3b9e153f1ef73c9a0d7d0a86db8c97187f26462516c.jpg
  • G0hByIQXcAAFGRB.jpeg
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Charlie stood for Faith, Family, and Country; Everything that crazed liberals hate